----------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacynotes Digest
Security Protecting Privacy is Good for Business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by: Mike Banks Valentine Privacynotes privacy@privacynotes.com
www.privacynotes.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
August 22, 2002 Issue # 022
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.....IN THIS DIGEST.....
// -- MODERATOR COMMENT -- //
~ Mike Banks Valentine
// -- NEW DISCUSSION -- //
"Digital ID World Conference" ~ Eric Norlin
// -- CONTINUING DISCUSSION -- //
"Spam - Criminal?" ~ Lyn Bernstein ~ Dirk
// -- PRIVACY NEWS -- //
"The Latest in Privacy Issues"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
// -- MODERATOR COMMENT -- //
Last week I attended an internet conference that didn't provide
internet access. Everyone was surprised, but the frustration for
those of us covering the event for the various media are rather
disturbed at needing to pay commercial rates of $30 per hour to
access office email, retrieve office documents and file reports
from a location without access to the web. Is it important? Absolutely.
Is it essential? No. Is it frustrating? Definitely
I suppose I will attend any future web related shows without
expecting that previously easy access and will be better prepared
to file stories from my hotel room and paid internet kiosks and
business centers at airports. Cutbacks are sometimes surprising.
What this means to you as subscribers is that that issue was
missing several posts that I couldn't access via email when the
hotel business center announced a surprise closing for employees
to handle personal matters.
I have more to say on that issue after paying $5 to download
1100 emails, of which 95% was spam. But I'll reserve that commentary
until I cool off a little.
Meanwhile, here's this week's issue with an announcement about
a conference many Privacynotes readers may be interested in attending
themselves. Fellow list member Eric Norlin of DigitalIDWorld offers
subscribers to Privacynotes a discount to attend a timely conference,
appropriate for readers and recommended by your humble moderator.
Take a look at Eric's note and consider visiting Colorado in October.
He's convinced me it's worthwhile and I expect you'll agree.
More next week!
// -- NEW DISCUSSION -- //
===> TOPIC: DIGITALIDWORLD CONFERENCE
From: Eric Norlin
Hey Mike-
as you know, I'm a pretty devoted reader to your list.....its
always informative -- with plenty of food for thought....
...and though I haven't had a huge amount of interaction with
the other readers of the list -- I wanted to extend an offer to
everybody....
We're (www.digitalidworld.com) having a conference in Denver
on October 9-11, 2002. This conference directly deals with the
issues of privacy in the context of national id systems, the development
of new technologies like Palladium, and the use of identity managment
systems within the corporation. Speakers include (gee, like everybody):
Esther Dyson, John Manferdelli (head of Palladium at msft), Brian
Arbogast (head of passport at msft), representatives from sun,
novell, versign, verifone, rsa security, a former head of the
IRS, the former general counsel for the NSA, the ex-CEO of FedEx,
the current CTO of GM, the current CTO of United Airlines, etc
etc.....
anyway, we think its gonna be a blast and a great conversation
starter.....
So (enough of me blathering)....here's the offer:
'Cuz I think this list's readers will contribute extensively
to this conversation, I've arranged for a discount code for registration.
That code is:
LNK1009 the code will take $250 off the normal registration
fee.....but please don't wait too long on this, as we're selling
out the hotel rooms in short order (so while you'll get into the
conference, you'd end up staying down the street)....
Anyway, I truly mean this in a spirit of goodwill and not as
a sales tactic....
more info here: http://www.digitalidworld.com/conference/2002/
And if I can answer questions, lemme know....
tks Eric Norlin Senior Editor, Digital ID World www.digitalidworld.com
// -- CONTINUING DISCUSSION -- //
===> TOPIC: SPAM - CRIMINAL?
From: Lynn Bernstein
Mike, you asked >> What are you doing and where do you
stand regarding spam? <<
I'm going to give you an unexpected answer. I had a client for
many years. In the past year they have started using the net,
first with
mail, and about two months ago their site was published. I was
there last week and one employee lost her address book (file).
She was devastated. In the conversation she mentioned she was
sending 'announcements' to large groups of customers and potential
customers on a regular basis.
This company has their mail server on an ISPs server, it is
virtual. Knowing possible consequences if anyone made a spam complaint
about these 'announcements', I made a point of warning them. I
informed them a
spam complaint could put them on a black hole list, with the
result the entire ISP would be included on the black hole list.
I also said the ISP
and all their other customers would be very upset. No matter
how good a customer my client is, the ISP would not jeopardize
their entire business for my client. I suggested this is not a
good business practice for my client.
The result of this conversation? The client decided I was telling
them how to run their business and severed the relationship.
Although some may feel that was a rather strong reaction (as
I do), from the client's point of view, I have in the past told
them 'how to run their business' by things such as suggesting
they have a 'mailing list' sign-up at trade shows, by telling
them they cannot track visitors to their site by ip address (and
where each ip address goes on the site), by harvesting the email
address of every visitor, by telling them they will get banned
from search engines by spamming them with such tricks as using
keywords in a small font of the same color as the background of
the page, and more.
So I am the bad guy and lost a client.
Lynn Bernstein ECG Consulting www.ecg-incc.com
===> TOPIC: SPAM - CRIMINAL?
From: Dirk
>> I'd like to openly ask you here, web professionals,
how you are affected by spam and whether you consider it to be
a privacy issue. <<
Yesterday, my ISP had us switch mail servers in an attempt to
combat spam. It will be six months, or more, before the spam is
up to the same level it was yesterday. In addition, I aggressively
use spam filters to separate unsolicited trash from regular e-mail.
One of the features of spam is that one is frequently bombarded
with repetitive messages, all containing the same, or similar
messages, making it relatively easy to filter out the majority
of spam messages, provided one picks out a few unique phrases
out of the body of the spam message to use for filtering.
Spam is a violation of privacy. Spammers are ruining the pristine
wilderness of the Internet by littering it with trash and refuse.
Fortunately, software developers are finally coming around and
developing better e-mail software technology. The new Netscape
7 has the best filters I have seen yet in a web/mail browser,
and I have been happily chugging along with only one or two spam
mails a day getting into my inbox (Quickly dispatched to the wastebasket,
after fine tuning the mail filter to prohibit further messages
from the same source / with the same content.)
Everyone will be seeing even better e-mail software than before,
with a mailpass feature instead of a mailstop feature. Mailstop
filters messages based on allowing only the addresses that the
recipient enters into the mail client to pass, and automatically
bounces unwanted e-mails, instead of allowing all messages to
enter, and then trying to filter them.
The result of that is that the Internet will become more private,
and communication channeled, and we'll all lose some of the equality
that an open communication system provides. A few ruining it for
all. The story of America today, hey?
With Regards, Dirk
P.S. my mail filters are available for all, Provided Mike is
willing to host a download section containing the filter. Do your
friends a favor, and share your filters!
[ Moderator Comment ]
I'll pass that question right on to the good folks at Privacynotes
and let you know by next issue what the consensus is.
// -- PRIVACY NEWS -- //
Moderator note: There are two ways to access previously listed
privacy news stories. One is to visit Privacynotes archives, the
other (simpler) way is to visit
http://privacynotes.com/privacy_news.html
where I also keep a privacy news archive.
TRENTON, Aug. 13 Ñ After weeks of negotiations with public advocacy
groups and New Jersey media organizations, Gov. James E. McGreevey
signed an executive order today rescinding most of the restrictions
he imposed last month on the state's new public records act.
Full Story: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/14/nyregion/14RECO.html
On August 7, the Iowa Supreme Court granted Planned Parenthood
of Greater Iowa its motion for a temporary stay against a subpoena
issued by officials in Buena Vista County. In an attempt to find
the mother of a newborn baby found dead at a recycling center
on May 30, a lower court ordered Planned Parenthood to turn over
by August 17 the names and addresses of women who had positive
pregnancy tests at one of its clinics from August 15, 2001 through
May 30, 2002. Planned Parenthood appealed to the Iowa Supreme
Court. County officials have until August 19 to file a response
to the appeal petition. For more, see ÒClinic can keep names confidential
for now,Ó Des Moines Register, Aug. 7, 2002 (http://www.dmregister.com);
ÒPregnancy tests remain private,Ó Omaha-World Herald, Aug. 7,
2002 (http://www.omaha.com).
Bush Rolls Back Rules on Privacy of Medical Data The Bush administration
on Friday formally rolled back some major protections for the
privacy of medical records adopted by President Clinton.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/10/politics/10PRIV.html
If you're interested in the latest thinking about gossip, forget
the self-serving plugs on Page Six, Entertainment Tonight and
People and pick up the International Journal of Applied Philosophy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/10/arts/10GOSS.html
It's Always Been Washington vs. the Field The urgent question
of revamping the Federal Bureau of Investigation lingers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/11/weekinreview/11LAZA.html
Financial Institutions May Facilitate Identity Theft The Internet
eases identity theft. But what victims may find most troubling
is that the accomplices may be their own financial institutions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/12/technology/12IDEN.html?tntemail
